基金项目同行评议的关键是项目的合理分组和评议专家的准确遴选。合理的分组代码和申请书中的关键词和摘要的标准化是解决这一关键问题的核心。农学基础与作物学涵盖领域广，学科发展迅速，出现很多新的领域和交叉领域，现有分组代码不能满足申请者在不同研究领域新的需要。同时，申请书中的关键词和摘要没有标准，存在多样性和不规范性，从而影响同行评议专家的准确遴选。本项目拟在现行申请代码的基础上，通过学科调研和近年来申请项目信息来完善申请代码，提出代码内的主要研究方向，从科学问题、研究对象、研究方法等不同层次挖掘各研究方向下的关键词。最终搭建基金申请人和评议人共识的学科体系，探索同行评议专家选择辅助系统的可行性、高效性和准确性。该研究将促进评审工作效率的提高，规范同行评议体系，推进同行评议制的科学性和公正性。

The key factors of NSFC project peer review are the reasonable grouping and accurate selection of evaluation experts.Rrational grouping code and standardization of the application of the keywords and abstract is the key to solve this problem. Basic agronomy and crop science covering wide areas, the subject rapid development, there are many new field and cross field. The grouping code can not meet the applicants in the new needs of different research fields. At the same time, there is no standard on keyword and abstract in project proposal. There is diversity and irregularity, which influence the accurate selection of peer review expert. This project will improve the application code through the investigation on the project information applied recent years, based on the present application codes, and put forward main research directions in the improved application code, and then evaluate keywords from the aspects of scientific issues, research object, research method. At last, the project will build a subject system which can be approved both by applicants and peer reviewers, and evaluate the feasibility, efficiency and accuracy of the peer reviewer selection auxiliary system. The research will promote the improvement of efficiency of review work, enhance the scientificity and rationality of peer reviewer selection, and standardization of peer review system.

为了建立合理高效的同行评议专家辅助选择系统，提高遴选专家工作的效率和准确性。本研究协助国家自然科学基金委生命科学部组织咨询专家根据学科发展新形势重新筛选和确定农学基础与作物学学科的研究方向和关键词，建立了关键词库，该研究将提高自然科学基金项目评审工作效率，推进同行评议制的科学性和公正性。